The arrival of ICT in the city multiplies the capacities to generate and store data useful to local authorities. It is up to them to engage in a policy of open data.
Local authorities also have the responsibility of contributing to the production of local data that is pertinent and open. According to OpenData France (association founded in 2013 to assemble and support French local authorities actively engaged in opening public data), emphasis should be placed especially on the following data:
- public decision-making (deliberation, attribution of subsidies to associations, public orders, etc.);
- civil registry (unless managed at national level);
- social services (childcare and schools, sports and culture, etc.);
- facilities (description, time table, event and frequentation);
- urban services: (transportation, waste, environment);
- planning (roads, networks, urban planning, geographic information);
- local events (fêtes, markets, etc.).
In the case of developing cities, for which local authorities often lack data, recourse to crowdsourcing Crowdsourcing Consists in the use of information, creativity, expertise or intelligence of a large number of people through the intermediary of a platform. From an economic approach, it may be a question of distributing a large number of tasks for the lowest cost. From a collaborative, social or altruistic approach, it is a question of making use of the specialist or volunteer networks of the general public to collect or process information. is an inexpensive solution for collecting additional information connected to reality.
Local authorities’ databases must gradually become the central nodes of the entire digital architecture. Whether third party applications, dematerialisation of internal procedures or the sharing of data with the private innovation sector, data structuring, harmonisation and standardisation will be decisive. If a local authority aims to steer governance and uses on the basis of their territorial data, it would do well to build or consolidate its own digitised databases and define the methods for opening internally and externally.
This process should improve communication, and therefore coordination, between the authorities and the population, but also between administrations, including the higher levels of government. Exchanges with other local authorities in the country can also allow the adoption of similar procedures to be able to exchange data according to uniform formats.
Opening the data
The data available on a territory can be either closed (paying), shared (with a limited number of users and subject to conditions), or open data. Digital data is increasingly considered common property. Opening data means offering everyone, without discrimination, data that is accessible (financially and technically) and usable (without restriction for developing new usages). Open data must be high quality and representative.
Making raw data available can enable the development of new services through the intermediary of firms who re-use them to develop digital solutions or to improve their supply of an urban service in the local territory.
Each local authority must make a clear choice between the digital data to be shared internally among the departments and those to be made accessible externally. This is how they will design their open data strategy.
It is therefore necessary to list, organise and “clean” the existing territorial data before sharing, that is to say building an information system that is clear, consistent, harmonious and organised. The data can be quantitative, but also qualitative in the form of videos, reports, surveys, etc. The data produced according to different sources will take different formats (in terms of time interval, geographic scale, reliability, etc.). Their cross-referencing therefore assumes a work of standardisation to reduce integration costs and avoid being held captive by a technological solution.
The databases must also be updated as often as possible, or even, if possible, geo-referenced. They must also be protected and secured. Management, in the end, comprises the integration of scattered data into a single base and cross-referencing the information. This interoperability of data that was previously scattered and incompatible, offers the possibility of a systemic vision of the city and its components, and of highlighting the black spots or creating synergies.
In the long term, opening the data supposes the creation of a team dedicated to the task within local authorities. This team shall then be responsible for the quality and integrity of the data within its remit.
Data management will become a competence in its own right among those devolved to local authorities and municipalities must prepare for this. There are open digital tools, in particular software platforms that do not require a licence or local server, but a subscription to products that are ready to use and available online.
Sharing data via Application Programming Interfaces
The opening of data is to make files available for the general public. They must be secured. Some of them must also be updated regularly, others in real time: it is on this basis that specialised applications can develop, such as, for example, an application with information on public transport schedules.
To be able to make this data available safely and the information remain stable, comprehensible, usable and consistent, it must offer application programming interfaces. They allow third parties to query the databases, then process them to develop applications. In that perspective, the authorities become the information supply platforms from which the start-ups develop value-added services.
Developing APIs (Application Programming Interface) pre-supposes confirmed technical skills, dedicated, and specialised teams for design and maintenance. The extra financial and human cost assumes a certain digital maturity on the local authority’s part.
According to OpenData France, it is up to the local territorial authorities to organise and publish the data for their area. They could do so on either:
- their own website;
- a dedicated data publishing site (portal), developed in-house or hosted by a specialist in the domain (OpendataSoft , MGDIS, ESRI, InfoPro, etc.);
- a shared publishing site managed by a public stakeholder of a higher level (region or State);
- theme portals or collective to a territory. The authority’s data could cohabit with other data from public or private sources.